Microvascular reconstructions in oral and maxillofacial surgery - Results of a survey among oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

This study aimed to evaluate the use of microvascular free flaps (MFF) in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. A dynamic online questionnaire, using 42-46 questions, was sent to OMF surgeons based in hospitals in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The questionnaire was evaluated internally and externally. Aside from general information, data were collected on organizational aspects, approaches, MFF types and frequency, presurgical planning, intraoperative procedures, perioperative medications, flap monitoring, and patient management. Participants mostly performed 30-40 MFF each year (11/53). Most stated that the COVID-19 pandemic did influence MFF frequency (25/53) to varying extents. Radial forearm flap was most frequently used (37/53), followed by ALT (5/53), and fibula flap (5/53). Primary reconstruction was performed by most participants (35/48). Irradiated bony transplants were mostly used for implant placement after 12 months (23/48). Most participants (38/48) used reconstruction plates, followed by miniplates (36/48), PSI reconstruction (31/48), and PSI miniplates (10/48). Regarding the postoperative use of anticoagulants, low-molecular-weight (37/48) and unfractioned heparins (15/48) were widely used, most often for 3-7 days (26/48). Clinical evaluation was mostly preferred for flap monitoring (47/48), usually every 2 h (34/48), for at least 48 h (19/48). Strong heterogeneity in MFF reconstructions in OMFS was found, especially regarding the timepoints of reconstruction, types of osteosynthesis, and postoperative MFF management. These findings provide the chance to further compare the different treatment algorithms regarding relevant MFF aspects, such as postoperative management. This could create evidence-based treatment algorithms that will further improve the clinical outcomes in MFF reconstructions.

Implementation and evaluation of a Tele-OSCE in oral and maxillofacial surgery - a pilot report.

Background: The ongoing changes in learning and education towards digitalisation have been rapidly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Especially in dental education where contact to the oral cavity is an integral part of training the chosen digital examination methods and training formats must undergo high requirements to full fill the goal of a real alternative to face-to-face exams. Therefore, this study compared student performance in a newly developed Tele-OSCE with a prior OSCE examinations in presence within an oral- and maxillofacial surgery curriculum. Methods: Study participants were fourth-year (in a five year curriculum) dental students and board certified maxillofacial surgeons (examiners) that took part in a newly developed Tele-OSCE that comprised three five-minute stations (structured facial examination, management mandibular fracture and squamous cell carcinoma) using the zoom® software. Student performance was measured using validated OSCE-Checklists and compared to a previous OSCE examination from the winter term 2019 with the same OSCE stations that was conducted in presence. Significant differences were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. Furthermore, the new Tele-OSCE was evaluated by students and examiners using previously developed questionnaires. Results: Sixty-six dental students (study group: n=34, summer term 2021, control group: n=32 winter term 2019) and nine examiners participated in the study. Compared to previous non-pandemic OSCEs, there were no significant (p=0.53) differences in overall student performance. Evaluation of the Tele-OSCE showed that the demonstration and rating of practical skills was limited due to missing standard patients or phantoms, however, students did not fear to be misjudged. The demonstration and rating of anamnestic and consultation competencies was seen as unproblematic by students and examiners. Discussion: This pilot-study showed the feasibility of a Tele-OSCE as a formative examination in dental education. However, both students and examiners felt that the demonstration and assessment of practical skills was limited due the new examination format. Nevertheless, Tele-OSCEs might offer an alternative to enable students to complete their dental training.

Management of acute dental problems: an aide-mémoire for referrals to oral and maxillofacial surgery.

The acute management of a facial swelling is a core competency for the dental practitioner. Onward referral to secondary care for acutely unwell patients requires timely decisions, with the referrer's initial assessment often critical in later management. Oral and maxillofacial triage is essential to ensure appropriate care is provided in the appropriate environment. Acute swelling and haemorrhage referrals to secondary care are not a common, everyday occurrence in general dental practice; however, the ability to provide a sufficient and safe handover will improve patient outcomes and ensure timely transfer to appropriate care providers. This article aims to provide the dental practitioner with insight into the oral and maxillofacial assessment of acute facial swellings and dental haemorrhage. The reader should be able to make an appropriate clinical assessment and communicate an effective referral to oral and maxillofacial care.

Virtual consultations for oral surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Following Covid-19, many departments have incorporated teledentistry into practice. As new consultation methods are introduced, it's imperative that patients have as similar an experience with virtual consultations to ensure informed decision-making. This project evaluated patients' perceptions of video consultations and determined if patients seen virtually received the same standard of information by auditing compliance with sending patient information leaflets (PILs) following video consultation. METHOD: The department's PILs were used to create an inclusion list for patients requiring a PIL. A retrospective audit assessed the notes of 100 video consultations for records of if PILs were sent and by what method. The department's PILs were digitalised and a clinical mailbox introduced enabling clinicians to email patients a PIL hyperlink. The audit was repeated for 88 video consultations. Patient and staff feedback was gathered via online surveys. RESULTS: Initially, 51% of cases met the criteria requiring a PIL and 16% of patients were sent PILs. Following mailbox introduction, 53% of cases met the criteria and 94% were sent PILs, 100% via email. Patient and staff feedback was positive regarding video consultations and digital PILS. Technical difficulties were reported in 44% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceive virtual consultations to be a positive change and the introduction of a mailbox enhances video consultations in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Patient information can be standardised, via digital PILs, regardless of consultation type. As departments implement post-pandemic changes, utilisation of a mailbox can provide multiple improvements to care.

An update on the current training situation of German interns in oral and maxillofacial surgery at special times in 2021.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current state of training of German interns in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. A previously tested questionnaire consisting of 53 questions was sent to interns in German OMFS (non-) university hospitals and private practices as an online survey. The questionnaire was adapted to current topics, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, aspects concerning nighttime and weekend services, overtime hours, surgical logbooks, benefits of academic degrees and support for scientific activities, part-time employment, parental leave and childcare. Next, results of questions from before the COVID-19 pandemic were re-evaluated. The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the clinical work (71.83%) and the current state of training (68.64%) in OMFS of most participants. Nighttime and weekend services are possible for employees in possession of only one degree (87.93% with a medical degree) in most hospitals. Not having one or both doctorate degrees was considered to be a disadvantage by 54.95%. In all, 42.11% of the participants attested to a positive influence of research on their training situation, and 50% reported financial or non-financial research support from the employer. Part-time employment was possible for 78.81% of the participants. The course of training was interrupted more often for women due to parental or maternity leave (10.53% of men and 30.95% of women). A total of 40.71% of the participants reported that childcare was available at the hospital, theoretically. The state of OMFS training in Germany can be referred to as positive. Current and future challenges are diverse, including aspects originating from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, gender aspects, reconciliation of family and work, and flexible working hours. Addressing these topics will ensure OMFS training at the highest surgical level and further increase interns' satisfaction, preserving the specialty's popularity and reception.

One year of COVID-19 pandemic: a cross sectional study on teaching oral and maxillofacial surgery.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic has challenged educational institutions to catalyze digitalization and rapidly develop online teaching formats. The aim of the study was to evaluate the teaching offered for oral and maxillofacial surgery at our university during the pandemic and to investigate the students' perceptions of the current situation. METHODS: A 38-item questionnaire with five sections (demographic information, lectures, internships, e-learning, and pandemic-related solutions/effects) was created online. Most questions were answered on a 10-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating "fully agree/positive" and 10 indicating "totally disagree/negative." The remaining questions were either answered with yes/no, percent value, or open-ended text responses. All 3rd-5th year dental students were invited to voluntarily participate and were sent a link by email in a general mail shot. RESULTS: A total of 63.7% of the participants had no prior experience with online courses before the pandemic. The students stated that the change from face-to-face to online teaching worked very well in the last two semesters (mean = 2.73, standard deviation = 2.05). Overall, the pandemic had a rather positive influence on the acquisition of theoretical skills and a negative influence on the acquisition of practical skills (p < 0.0001). The evaluation showed that, compared to other dental clinics at our university, the department for oral and maxillofacial surgery was well prepared for the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Digitalization of oral and maxillofacial surgery teaching in dental education is possible but depends on the institution's preparatory work and technological possibilities. The students declared a high acceptance of digital learning formats and indicated an increased motivation to learn due to e-learning. The pandemic's influence on the students' education was rated ambivalent.

How has the COVID Pandemic Impacted the Clinical Volume and Variety of an Academic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Program?

PURPOSE: Attempts to mitigate the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID) have disrupted the delivery of non-pandemic care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the COVID pandemic on surgical volume and variety at an academic oral and maxillofacial surgery program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the surgical logs of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery from January 2012 through January 2021. Each record identified patient demographics and case classifications. The study predictor was timing of care, which was divided into pre-pandemic, peak pandemic, or post-peak pandemic. The primary study outcomes were the monthly procedure count and the procedure categories. The secondary dependent variables were patient age and race. Multivariate and univariate analyses of variance were used to determine whether pandemic effects existed within outcome groups. RESULTS: The final sample included 64,709 surgical procedures. Before, during, and after the pandemic peak, there were means of 691.0, 209.0, and 789.4 procedures per time period, respectively (P < .01). There was significantly more infection (baseline 2.2%, peak 6.0%, post-peak 2.0%, P < .01) and trauma (baseline 5.3%, peak 26.7%, post-peak 3.9%, P < .01) cases during the pandemic peak. The mean percentage of pediatric patients increased during the peak and post-peak periods (baseline 2.4%, peak 12.9%, post-peak 10.2%, P < .01). No differences were observed among the mean percentage of White (P = .12), Black (P = .21), and Hispanic (P = .25) patients treated. CONCLUSIONS: Along with a predictable decline in surgical numbers, a greater proportion of infection and trauma procedures were performed at the pandemic's peak. Despite these changes, surgery volume normalized and case variety returned to pre-pandemic levels in the post-peak period. Our study suggests that the addition of COVID restrictions did not change the case volume or variety in the months' after the initial crisis.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) Consultant Workforce in the UK: reducing consultant numbers resulting from recruitment issues, pension pressures, changing job-plans, and demographics when combined with the COVID backlog in elective surgery, requires urgent action.

Mean retirement age for UK doctors is 59.6 years, giving the average OMFS consultant approximately 20 years of practice. Current pension tax regulations, new consultant posts typically restricted to a maximum of 10 sessions (40 hours), increasing proportions of consultants working less than full time (LTFT), all combined with the backlog of elective care created by COVID-19 will create a significant gap between workforce capacity and clinical demand. The age of current OMFS consultants was estimated using the date of their primary medical/dental qualification. Changes in job plans were estimated using data from the BAOMS Workforce Census and from recently advertised posts. Reports of unfilled posts were collated by OMFS Regional Specialty Professional Advisors (RSPAs). First degree dates were identified for 476 OMFS substantive consultant posts. Estimated current average age of OMFS consultants was 52.7 years (minimum 35.9, maximum 72.1), 75th centile age 59.0 and 23% of the current consultant workforce above the average retirement age for doctors. The 10 sessions of new OMFS consultants posts is significantly less than existing consultants' average of 12.1 sessions (48.4 hours). Unfilled consultant posts in Great Britain are 13% of the total compared to 20% in Northern Ireland and Ireland. Many (23%) of the OMFS consultant workforce are above average retirement age. Forty-hour contracts; new consultants working LTFT; and early loss of senior colleagues because of pension pressure will reduce NHS' capacity to treat OMFS disorders and injuries. This paper suggests increasing consultant posts, increasing trainee numbers, and actively retaining senior surgeons to maintain capacity.

Impact of COVID-19 on maxillofacial surgery practice: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the possible impacts of COVID-19 on oral and maxillofacial surgery practice, as well as the protocols employed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons to minimize the risks of contamination. METHODS: Searches were performed in different databases up to 15 March 2021. Articles related to oral surgery dynamics within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic were included. The articles were considered eligible if they met the following inclusion criteria: observational studies that provided recommendations regarding maxillofacial surgery measures during the COVID-19 pandemic and that analyzed the risk of contamination of patients/professionals with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the present systematic review. Demands for personal protective equipment increased significantly, with studies reporting the scarcity of fundamental equipment such as FFP2/N95 masks. Significant changes in the infrastructure of outpatient, surgical and inpatient units and in the care protocols themselves were observed. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic particularly affected the routine of oral and maxillofacial surgery residents. Several additional recommendations for surgical practice or for the surgical team were evaluated and discussed, such as performing primarily urgent and emergency surgeries, remote patient care and screening, postponing elective surgeries, and new teaching methods in oral and maxillofacial surgery residency programs. In addition, screening of patients and of the surgery team for COVID-19 is strongly recommended.

The Incidence of COVID-19 Patients in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

PURPOSE: The SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic has resulted in widespread changes to healthcare practices across the United States. The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of COVID-19 patients in the oral-maxillofacial surgery setting in order to help guide perioperative protocols during the pandemic. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, predictor variables (presence of preoperative symptoms on presentation, patient age, patient gender, patient race, hospital location, and presence of statewide stay-at-home orders) were examined with outcome variables (SARS-CoV-2 test results) over 10 months between March 2020 and December 2020 for patients undergoing surgical procedures in the operating room by the following Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery Departments: - Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (Baton Rouge, LA) - University of Illinois at Chicago (Chicago, IL) - University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Houston, TX) Data analysis included Fisher exact tests to compare categorical variables across COVID test groups and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to compare continuous covariates. Two-sample tests of proportions were used to compare observed COVID-19 positivity rates to other study results. RESULTS: Out of 684 patients in 3 institutions, 17 patients (2.5%, 95% CI = 1.5 to 4.0%) tested positive for COVID-19 over a 10 month interval (March 1, 2020- December 31, 2020). The majority of patients that tested positive were asymptomatic in the preoperative setting (P-value = .09). They were significantly more likely to be African-American (P-value = .015) and less likely to have a stay-at-home order present at the time of surgery (P-value = .033). Age, gender, and hospital location did not play a statistically significant role. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a 2.5% incidence of COVID-19 infection in the total population of patients undergoing scheduled oral-maxillofacial surgeries in 3 major healthcare systems across the United States. This data may help inform perioperative protocols and infection control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on orofacial and respiratory infections in ear, nose, and throat and oral and maxillofacial surgery emergency departments: a retrospective study of 7900 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The study purpose was to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rate and disease profile of orofacial and respiratory infections in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) emergency units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of patients with orofacial or respiratory infection, or infectious symptoms, diagnosed in the OMFS or ENT Emergency Departments of the Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland between 1st March and 30th October 2020 and the corresponding periods in 2018 and 2019 were reviewed. The main outcome variable was the occurrence of studied infections during the evaluated periods. Other study variables were age, gender, residence area, speciality, specific cause for the emergency department visit and admission to ward. RESULTS: There was a significant 37% decrease in the number of infection patients in 2020 compared to the years 2019 and 2018 (1894 vs. 2929 and 3077, respectively, p < .001). A mean decrease of 51% (from 1319 and 1249 patients in 2018 and 2019, respectively, to 592 patients in 2020) was seen in the "Other ENT respiratory infection" category. ENT patients were 51% less likely to be admitted to the ward in 2020 compared to 2019 and 2018 (p = .013). CONCLUSION: A significant decrease was observed in the volume of emergency department visits for orofacial and respiratory infections during the COVID-19-pandemic in 2020 compared to the non-COVID periods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It seems that social distancing, facial mask wearing, and other infection prevention precautions have changed the accustomed patient profile in orofacial and respiratory infections.

MaxSim: a novel simulation-based education course for OMFS emergencies.

For oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) senior house officers (SHOs) with no formal medical training, the first exposure to emergency scenarios will be the first time they have to manage them, usually alone. Simulation-based education (SBE) has been demonstrated to increase experience and confidence when used in medical education, so an OMFS SBE course was created to facilitate this. The course was centred on scenarios that necessitate a rapid response, including sepsis, retrobulbar haemorrhage, and carotid artery blowout. A questionnaire with a 10-point numerical score was given to assess the change in confidence when managing these scenarios. Learner numbers were limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but all 10 completed both questionnaires. There was an even distribution between first and second-year SHOs. Two had received simulation training before, but it was very limited. In all stations every learner felt an increase in confidence, on average by 45% (range 38%-56%, p<0.05) on the 10-point scale. Positive feedback was also given by them all. SBE has been shown to be an invaluable method of training for clinical scenarios and needs to become common in OMFS. The course is to be expanded post COVID-19 to become available nationally.

What Are the Lessons Learned From the Virtual Interview Process for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Programs Affected by COVID-19?

PURPOSE: With the outbreak of COVID-19, residency programs for the 2020 to 2021 OMS interview cycle were forced to quickly adapt to a new method of assessing candidates-virtual interviewing-for the first time. The purpose of this study is to describe applicants' perspectives regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the virtual interview process through an online descriptive survey. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilizes a descriptive survey sent to the 2020 to 2021 interview cycle applicants of the University of Illinois at Chicago Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (UIC OMS) residency program. The survey consisted of questions employing both scaled and open-ended designs. The questions were fabricated to extrapolate applicants' perceived advantages and disadvantages of virtual interviewing compared to their expectations of in-person interviewing by focusing on interactions, number of interviews received/attended, and overall applicant satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were computed for each variable for data analysis. RESULTS: In the 2020 to 2021 UIC OMS residency cycle, there were 288 applications. A total of 102 surveys were collected (response rate = 35.4%). Respondents attended more interviews during the virtual format due to accessibility (64.7%), and cost savings (63.7%). 42.2% of applicants felt they did not present themselves as well during the virtual interview as they would have in person and 46.1% felt they did not have a good understanding of the culture of the program after the interview. 49.0% of all participants do not feel that virtual interviews should continue in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual formats would allow access to a greater number of interviews; however, they lack the ability to promote effective interaction between applicants, residents, and faculty members. The results of the study show that although applicants agreed that interviews were more accessible this year, they felt that the "personal" interaction was lacking and they could not present themselves effectively with the virtual format. Ultimately, almost half (49%) of the respondents do not wish for virtual interviews to continue in the future.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Professional Career of Women in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

The COVID-19 pandemic altered all facets of society on a fundamental level, impacting work, mental health, and family life. Female surgeons experienced gender inequity and bias before COVID; therefore, women in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) were affected disproportionately by the repercussions of the pandemic. Well-established inequalities are intensified during times of crisis. This article enlightens readers regarding the preexisting inequalities in the OMS specialty, how the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these ubiquitous issues, and how the specialty should accommodate these inequities moving forward.